Search This Blog

Thursday 22 April 2010

A NIGHT AT THE HUSTINGS...

Last night saw our local candidates go head to head in St Nick’s, Tooting for a church-organised hustings in this most open of elections. Well, at least, that was the theory. But let’s start with the major disappointment – Sadiq Khan didn’t show, instead sending Rex Osborn, a local Labour councillor, in his place. This entirely denied the 100-ish present a heavyweight clash and utterly flattened the field for Conservative Mark Clarke. The Liberal Democrat candidate Nasser Butt was present but, with all due respect, it seems his party has (understandably given prior performance) decided not to seriously contest the seat. Butt was an amiable chap, but often failed to grasp the gist of questions asked and gave a shambling performance rather bringing to mind Mr Bean. Cleggmania seems somewhat redundant in SW17… Add this to the fact Councillor Harmon really wasn’t trying to play the part of a candidate – not bothering to stand to answer and saying literally half as much as either of the others – and you are essentially left with the Mark Clarke show.

And it was an impressive show. This guy has been groomed for these moments. He was selected three years ago and moved then back to the area, given time to lead local campaigns and become a champion of the people. It’s cynical in a way – but strangely flattering that Tooting is deemed so important (according to Clarke in conversation afterwards, everyone from CNN to Al-Jazeera are scheduled to be present there for election night – his party have never taken the seat before and it may go down to the last vote!) – and I have personally reaped the benefit of it; Clarke having played a lead role in taking on the infamous Soma Café, next door to my flat. Clarke is a smooth politician; he sussed the audience in a way neither of the others came close to – with an overwhelmingly Christian audience, there were easy ovations to be gained by going hard on abortion, favouring freedom of speech and defending Christian heritage. He brought them home with ease.

Most impressive, however, was Clarke’s contribution to the Health debate. I asked the prompting question, one reflecting on the strengths and issues encountered during my wife’s brain surgery at St. George’s last year, and asking how money would find its way to front line services and staff. Butt’s answer was lame and ill-informed. Osborn went, as I’d expect, down the route of strongly defending St George’s as a great hospital and a privilege we should appreciate. This was more cynical than it sounds – designed to capitalise on recent news stories accusing Clarke of having exaggerated and scaremongered in undermining the hospital for political capital. But Clarke is way above mere gestures on this. He has been showing up to board meetings at St. George’s since arriving in the area. He is an ambassador for Tory’s famous ‘efficiency savings’, having seen the hospital board double in size and award themselves pay rises – NHS Wandsworth in one case paying £750,000 to an individual for an 8-month management contract. By his own admission, the board ‘hate’ him for these observations and he has evidence they themselves leaked the story of his ‘attacks’ on the hospital to the press. But he is in no way an enemy of NHS front-line services; his wife and mother both working in local hospitals. This was clearly his field of expertise and I would have loved to see him lock horns with Sadiq Khan over it.

Which brings us to the other refreshing thing about Clarke. There was a total absence of negative campaigning from him – another calculation for the benefit of the Christian audience? Possibly, but I get the feeling he and Khan are actually pretty good mates outside of election season. He referred to his rival as a ‘local champion’, an ‘exceptional MP’ and, in conversation, even a ‘role model’ to follow if he takes the seat. This goes way beyond mere platitudes.

In fact, I thought the worst thing Clarke did at any stage was to summarise by reminding everyone it was really about David Cameron. This was surely an outdated move, lacking recognition of the poor campaign his leader is having, and the electoral turn-off he’s becoming. After a performance as good as this, the last thing Clarke needed to do was remind us of his bewildered boss. You can bet ‘Gordon Brown’ would have been as unlikely a closing thought from Khan in this company as would ‘socialism’. In fact Cameron is the biggest threat faced by the Tories in Tooting – another poor debate by him tonight and you have to imagine the swing required to deliver Tooting might be gone for good. And it truly has been a poor campaign by the Tories on the whole – when was the last time you heard mention of the ‘Big Society’ presented with great fanfare at the manifesto launch? It already seems like yesterday’s news… (although the policy of parent-owned schools was raised last night – the test case will be up the road in Battersea).

So, where do I now stand? Well, locally Mark Clarke has won me over (and if he does win, you’ll soon hear plenty more of him), and the Lib Dems don’t factor. Which is something of a shame, as nationally the Conservatives are having a ‘mare and there is the prospect of real Lib Dem-propelled excitement. Still, it’s no done deal – I’ve very much enjoyed my ‘floating’ status in a marginal seat this time around. I’ve had a long email from one heavyweight candidate and a long conversation with the other. I’m running a school election launching on Monday, and more people than you might imagine are reading the blog! I’m well aware I’m unlikely to see another election like this one so I’ll continue to enjoy it while it lasts…

7 comments:

  1. Any reason given why Sadiq Khan didn't show up? I presume he was expected to. Seems like a poor show to me. Makes it odd to think he'd write a lengthy reply to an individual email, but not take the opportunity to speak to more people all at once. What other good questions emerged from it - we've got a hustings next Wed in Chelsea.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're so wrong about Mark Clarke it hurts.

    This is a man who on the doorstep heavily implied that Sadiq only represents the Muslim population in Tooting and doesn't care about the white middle classes.

    His dog whistle politics over the Springfield Development was also disgusting. Some of his literature was disgraceful, misleadingly suggesting that plans to build affordable housing on the site would mean the whole thing would be turned into a huge council estate.

    You've recognised he's a consumate performer - now do a little bit more digging before you sing his praises. He is not to be trusted.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Emily,

    Sounds like your a hater to me. Please substantiate claims with evidence. Andy was describing the hustings and I think he did an excellent job.

    Regards,

    Lauri

    Ps Andy v. good review of the way the evening went, though I didn't think Nassir did that badly and personally thought Rex was quite good...

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's difficult to substantiate something he said in a public meeting. But there were 200 other people there, find one of them!

    'Hater' is a strong word.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 'disgusting' and 'disgraceful' are strong words too Emily. So I feel the use of the word 'hater' is justified.

    With respect, you talked about doorsteps and literature and now you are talking about a public meeting of 200 people... So I am a bit confused as to what you are referring to.

    Where did Mark say these things you accuse him of saying?

    If you refer to the hustings, I was there. I am asking you about the smears you make and am asking you to substantiate those.

    ReplyDelete
  6. They aren't smears. The 'council estate' claim was made at a meeting of local residents in January last year, and repeated in a letter he sent out before the elections.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Andy, Thanks for your article. Really helpful. I would have loved to have been there, but was away on holiday. Thanks for taking the time.

    I'm pleased Mr Clark was generous to Mr Khan. I have found him to be an excellent MP, always replying to letters and trying to help. He has disappointed me in the way he has voted in the House, but as others have noted, he needs to vote according to the party line, but that clearly wouldn't be my preference.

    Ed Drew

    ReplyDelete