Search This Blog

Monday 19 July 2010

LOVE = DISCIPLINE



So what issue is it that has brought me back to the blogosphere? What burning dilemma had me pick up my laptop in haste? Well... I last night had the dubious fortune to be present as my wife watched a fly-on-the-wall programme tracking the life and times of one Peter Andre; singer, presenter, former wife of Katie Price and ‘Dad of the Year’ in both 2008 and 2010. And it is that last point that engaged my interest. Never mind the lunacy of the Now-reading public making such an arbitrary judgement, nor even why we are applauding one who sets up a TV camera prior to phoning his kids and places them in weekly photo-shoots and documentary’s in order to further his own career. No what has really got my goat is actually the criteria by which people are judging what it is to be a good parent.

For the prosecution I bring before you Case One, from last night’s show. Junior – Andre’s son – was, as usual, misbehaving in the spoilt, petulant manner in which he’s been raised. Charmingly for a 5-year old, Junior replied to an attempted instruction by his father with the televised retort ‘If he tells me that again, I’ll cut his head off’. Peter, upon hearing this, looked very sad and whined back “Junior, why do you say these things? You know it makes me upset”. Junior then hid under a desk, at which his dad apologised to him, in order to entice him back out to reconcile. The scene ended with the two hugging and each saying sorry; the backing music and voiceover made it abundantly clear that this was a happy ending to the scene and an example of the loving hands-on way that Dad of the Year Peter resolves such family issues.

Now I’m not disputing that this chap loves his kids. But WHERE IS THE DISCIPLINE?? Where is the incentive for this child to not threaten to kill his father next time? Where’s the lesson learned? Ultimately it gained him the attention he was seeking, along with an apology and a cuddle to boot. There is a missing stage here – any type of sanction. It’s worrisome because the public, en masse, are praising this approach (I’ve watched more of the programme than I should willingly admit, and this pattern; of rebellion, non-punishment and cuddles is repeated in every episode). Neither is it unique to Peter Andre – we are all too familiar with the US movie/TV staple of the parent who scolds the child, sees the child turn away or run from the room and at once apologises, explaining the true underlying reason for his/her inexcusable hostility. WHERE IS THE DISCIPLINE? Why has it become so unthinkable to upset children? They’re not fragile little dolls – they’re little humans, often characterised by rebellion, cruelty even, and very soon to be a grown-up for many more years than they were a child.

A few provisos – no I’m not a parent, and therefore have little authority on the issue of parenting. But I have been a teacher for 7 years. We pick up the pieces of this widespread syndrome – of the parents who spoil their kids rotten, allow them to treat mum and dad like mates and who know all their rights but none of their responsibilities or obligations. Parents all too often take Little Jonny’s side if he’s accused or sanctioned; they tactily (or overtly) encourage a culture of answering back, questioning every instruction and worsening, by degree, attitudes and behaviours in my, and every, school. Another proviso is that I’m not an arch-disciplinarian as a teacher, and I wouldn’t want to be seen as pretending otherwise. I smile and banter in lessons, encouraging discussion and trying to utilise informal humour. But it’s getting harder to do that, because it requires knowing where the line is, listening to others and treating them with respect. What’s more it’s only possible to do that if kids feel secure in knowing where the boundaries are; that there will be well-established punishments from me if someone behaves in a disruptive and unsettling fashion. Of late, there’s been an increasing number of groups where I have had to resort to the snarl and silence I don’t enjoy. It represents an increase in boys (I have until now taught in all-boys school) who have never learned the discipline required for more productive interaction.

If and when I am a parent I will endeavour to be stricter than many might expect or encourage. Rebellion, at any age, is a conscious decision and has to be acknowledged as such, with consequences attached. Just as with teaching, any sanction promised (‘if you do a, b will happen’) has to be followed through with . Easier said than done? Egg waiting to be landed on my face? Quite possibly... who knows my reality once it happens? But I do know that, were it not for a society that has ruled such things unacceptable, I would certainly tell off other peoples’ kids a lot more, in order to save myself doing it later once they’re a problematic teenager sitting in my classroom! The single most inspiring thing I’ve ever heard in the realm of parenting is from my pastor (whose kids are accordingly a credit) whose no-doubt misquoted approach basically comes down to ‘unmistakeable love, unyielding discipline’. It translates to lots of affection and cuddles every day, but no wrongdoing unpunished! I would suggest that, so long as he remains only half way there, Peter Andre is a less inspiring model to emulate...

PS I have spent some time this weekend with the children of one or two potential readers. Please know this is NO reflection on you and them – just on Peter Andre! In the case of the Bristol-based toddler I had the pleasure of meeting yesterday, the issue of discipline is particularly non-applicable as she behaved like a dream for the entire three hours we were there! The parents are clearly doing something right...

6 comments:

  1. Wife Swap always includes a family with a bonkers attitude to discipline, and the results are never good.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why thank you! (from one parent of said Bristol-based nipper.) But we do have a slight unfair advantage in that Wifeshui has read pretty much every textbook on child development going, and has done plenty of work in the field of child and family psychology during her career. The upshot of which is that we agree with you wholeheartedly - parents have to be parents first, mates a distant second - Wifeshui has seen far too many examples of kids whose families tried to raise them with love, but not discipline, and the results are not pretty. Seems to be more and more common nowadays, and I think, as you say, the lowest-common-denominator celebrity culture media has much to answer for in that respect.

    I'd be interested to know how you see such discipline being imposed, though. Are you one of the James Dobson acolytes who sees parenting as warfare, with attendant assault and battery as a way of subjugating one's rebellious offspring? I seem to recall (*tracks down old post from defunct blog*) that you used to argue in favour of it - having met the never-smacked-but-still-well-behaved Babyshui, do you still maintain that corporal punishment is an effective parenting tool?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ha! I'd love to find someone who'd answer 'yes I see parenting as warfare with attendant assault and battery'! I've read no Dobson whatsoever but no I'm not anti-smacking. I have no issue whatsoever with the fact I was occasionally smacked as a child (as opposed to assaulted or battered!), as were virtually all my friends. And no I wouldn't rule it out as a sparingly and moderately applied deterrent. Interestingly, I was watching an early episode of The Simpsons the other day; there's a gag where Homer calls Bart over for a chart and Bart instantly, assuming he's in trouble, sighs, lowers his keks and assumes the position over Homer's knee. Imagine that now! The pendulum has swung fast and pretty much unnecessarily on this one...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I totally agree with you!

    ReplyDelete
  5. To further cement my reputation as a consumer of daytime TV, Supernanny is all about discipline, every single time. I am sure the naughty step is now a fixture in middle-class homes up and down the land.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And yet Supernanny appears to achieve her successes entirely without recourse to corporal punishment...

    Sorry Andy, I don't mean to drag this off into a pro/anti-smacking debate. Fact is, I agree with pretty much everything you've said in your post (and I particularly like the line about kids knowing their rights but not their responsibilities). They key seems to be boundary-setting; creating and maintaining clearly-defined limits as to what is and is not acceptable is vital from even the earliest age. Babyshui is well aware, already, that certain acts are not going to get Mummy and Daddy's approval, and she tends to refrain from them. At the moment, the problems that arise are ones of understanding - she doesn't realise that kissing and biting are different activities, for example, and can't figure out why she gets praised for one and dissuaded from the other. Later, when we get to the boundary-testing stage, things will get more interesting; I'll let you know how we fare.

    ReplyDelete